![[TEST] The Objective Standard](https://test.theobjectivestandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/logo.png){kind=logo}
Image: Gage Skidmore
GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan sets forth his basic political philosophy in an August 13, 2012 article for American Spectator, “Who Built America?”
Ryan explicitly attempts to make the “moral case” for capitalism, arguing that “people have a God-given right to use their creativity to produce things that improve their lives.”
Ryan’s attempt to defend the morality of capitalism is a good sign. Over the years, many free-market advocates have made excellent economic arguments for capitalism, but this has done relatively little to stem the tide of statism. Ryan, to his credit, recognizes the importance of making a moral argument.
Unfortunately, although Ryan speaks out against “crony capitalism” (which is properly called fascism), his own voting record—including his votes for the TARP bank bailouts and auto industry bailouts—undercuts his case.
If Ryan were to repudiate his earlier capitulations to statism, he could win over many voters. Most Americans are willing to forgive a politician who acknowledges past errors and makes amends. On the other hand, if Ryan continues to dig in and defend those statist votes, he will further undermine his credibility—just as Mitt Romney’s persistent defense of his Massachusetts health care plan continues to undermine his credibility.
Unfortunately, Ryan’s attempted defense of capitalism is hampered not only by political inconsistency, but also by philosophical inconsistency.
As Ayn Rand points out, capitalism leaves men free to pursue their self-interest according to their best independent judgment. And, as a cursory glance at history or at the Index of Economic Freedom confirms, to the extent that capitalism has been tried, it has led to prosperity and human flourishing.
Ryan partially and implicitly recognizes the importance of rational self-interest when he states that capitalism enables people to “improve their lives,” but he fails to make the connection that improving one’s life is a clearly self-interested pursuit. This failure should come as no surprise because Ryan’s Catholicism requires him to reject the morality of self-interest. And, in so doing, it undercuts his ability to defend capitalism.
Fortunately, with the renewed media attention now being given to Ayn Rand and her ideas—in large part because of Ryan—more Americans are learning where they can find a logically grounded, uncompromising moral defense of the social system of human prosperity. Hopefully, Ryan’s supporters will let him know that Rand’s ideas are good all the way down. And perhaps one day he will come to embrace the philosophy that supports freedom.
Like this post? Join our mailing list to receive our weekly digest. And for in-depth commentary from an Objectivist perspective, subscribe to our quarterly journal, The Objective Standard.
Related:
- Capitalism and the Moral High Ground
- Romney-Ryan 2012—Ayn Rand Forever
- Further Thoughts on Why Objectivists Should Actively Campaign for Romney-Ryan
- Paul Ryan Rejects Ayn Rand’s Ideas—In Word and Deed
Image: Gage Skidmore
You might also like
